Braze vs Iterable (and mailfloss): Which Customer Engagement Platform Actually Scales With Your Business in 2025? cover
/ Blog

Choosing between Braze and Iterable for your customer engagement needs often comes down to these five critical questions:

  • Do you need a platform built for massive enterprise scale, or one that balances power with approachability?
  • Is your team ready to invest months learning a complex system, or do you need to launch sophisticated campaigns next week?
  • Are you willing to pay premium prices for every possible feature, or do you want targeted capabilities at a more reasonable cost?
  • Does your marketing team have dedicated technical resources, or do they need to work independently?
  • Is maintaining pristine email list hygiene a manual afterthought, or should it happen automatically?

In short, here’s what we recommend:

👉 Braze is the enterprise powerhouse built for global brands that need to orchestrate billions of messages across multiple channels. With its real-time data processing, sophisticated Canvas Flow journey builder, and deep mobile expertise, it’s the platform of choice for companies like Disney, HBO, and Canva. However, its premium pricing (often $60,000-200,000+ annually), steep learning curve, and dependency on technical resources make it a significant commitment that smaller teams may find overwhelming.

👉 Iterable strikes a compelling balance between enterprise capabilities and marketer-friendly design. Its visual Studio workflow builder, AI-powered optimization, and flexible data model enable sophisticated cross-channel campaigns without requiring an engineering degree. While it may lack some of Braze’s raw power and mobile-specific features, its more approachable interface makes it ideal for growing companies and mid-market teams who need results without the enterprise complexity.

Both platforms excel at orchestrating customer journeys and personalizing experiences. But here’s what they don’t tell you: poor email list hygiene can undermine even the most sophisticated engagement strategy. That’s where an often-overlooked piece of the puzzle comes in.

👉 mailfloss automates the critical but tedious task of email list hygiene, ensuring your Braze or Iterable campaigns actually reach real people. This “set-it-and-forget-it” service runs daily and real-time cleanups, fixes typos automatically, and removes invalid addresses before they damage your sender reputation. At just $29-209/month, it’s the affordable insurance policy that protects your expensive marketing platform investment by maintaining deliverability and improving ROI.

If maintaining a clean email list sounds like the missing piece of your engagement strategy, see how mailfloss works with your platform.

Table of Contents:

Braze vs Iterable vs mailfloss at a glance

Here’s the fundamental difference: While Braze and Iterable compete for enterprise marketing automation dominance, mailfloss solves a foundational problem both platforms handle only at a basic level.

Braze Iterable mailfloss
Primary Function ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Enterprise customer engagement platform ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Cross-channel marketing automation ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Automated email verification
Target Market Enterprise & large mid-market Mid-market to enterprise Businesses using email marketing
Ease of Use ⭐⭐ Complex, steep learning curve ⭐⭐⭐⭐ More intuitive, visual workflows ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 60-second setup
Pricing Transparency ⭐ Opaque, enterprise negotiations ⭐⭐ Limited public information ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Clear tiers published
Starting Price ~$5,000-10,000/month ~$500-1,000/month $29/month
Real-Time Processing ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Sub-second latency ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Real-time capabilities ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Instant verification
AI Capabilities ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Comprehensive AI suite ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Deep AI integration N/A
Mobile Expertise ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Industry-leading ⭐⭐⭐ Good coverage N/A
Email List Hygiene ⭐⭐ Basic bounce handling ⭐⭐ Basic bounce handling ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Core focus

The philosophical divide: Enterprise power vs accessible sophistication

Braze and Iterable emerged from different visions of what marketing automation should be, and these founding philosophies still shape their platforms today.

Braze began as Appboy in 2011, when mobile was just becoming central to customer engagement. The founders, coming from Google and Bridgewater Associates, built a platform designed to handle the complexities of mobile-first communication at massive scale. This DNA shows in everything from their infrastructure (processing 3.9 trillion Canvas actions in 2024) to their pricing model that assumes enterprise-level budgets.

Iterable took a different path when it launched in 2013. Founded by former Google and Twitter engineers, the platform aimed to democratize sophisticated marketing automation. They believed that personalized, cross-channel campaigns shouldn’t require a team of engineers or a Fortune 500 budget. This philosophy manifests in their drag-and-drop workflow builder and more approachable pricing structure.

The contrast becomes clear in how each platform handles complexity. Braze embraces it, offering granular control over every aspect of the customer journey. Their Canvas Flow can create journeys with dozens of branches, complex logic, and real-time adjustments. It’s powerful but demands significant expertise to use effectively.

Iterable masks complexity behind intuitive interfaces. Their Studio workflow builder uses similar concepts but presents them in a way that marketers can grasp quickly. You’re not sacrificing power for simplicity; you’re getting sophisticated capabilities wrapped in a more digestible package.

mailfloss, founded by Martin after experiencing his own deliverability issues, represents a third philosophy entirely: solve one critical problem exceptionally well. While Braze and Iterable compete on features, mailfloss focuses solely on email list hygiene. This laser focus allows them to automate what would otherwise be a manual, error-prone process that both Braze and Iterable users must handle separately.

Real-time capabilities reveal platform priorities

Real-time data processing separates modern engagement platforms from legacy solutions, and both Braze and Iterable excel here, though in different ways.

Braze‘s real-time infrastructure is built for scale. Their streaming data architecture, powered by Kafka and MongoDB, processes events with sub-second latency. When a user abandons their cart, Braze can trigger a personalized message across any channel within moments. This speed is crucial for time-sensitive use cases like live sports updates or flash sale notifications.


Source: Braze

The platform’s Event Delivery System ensures that even at massive scale, events are delivered reliably. During Black Friday 2023, Braze sent over 37 billion messages while maintaining 99.99% uptime. This reliability at scale is what justifies their premium pricing for many enterprises.

Iterable‘s real-time capabilities focus more on accessibility than raw performance. While they also process data in real-time, their emphasis is on making these capabilities usable by marketers without technical backgrounds. Their behavioral triggers work instantly but are configured through visual interfaces rather than code.

Source: Iterable

The difference shows in implementation. Setting up real-time triggers in Braze often requires developer involvement to properly track events and configure the logic. In Iterable, marketers can create similar triggers independently using the visual workflow builder.

mailfloss adds a different dimension to real-time processing: verification at the point of capture. Their Instafloss feature validates email addresses at the point of entry, preventing invalid data from ever entering your Braze or Iterable database. This proactive approach is more effective than cleaning lists after the fact.

Journey builders showcase different approaches to complexity

The journey builder is where marketing automation platforms reveal their true nature, and the contrast between Braze’s Canvas Flow and Iterable’s Studio is striking.

Braze‘s Canvas Flow is an engineer’s dream. It supports virtually unlimited complexity with features like:

  • Nested paths and advanced branching logic
  • Experiment paths for sophisticated A/B testing
  • Action-based triggers that respond to any custom event
  • User update tiles that modify profiles mid-journey
  • Integration tiles that connect to external systems via webhooks

Source: Braze

The power is undeniable, but so is the complexity. Building a sophisticated journey in Canvas Flow often requires careful planning, technical knowledge, and significant testing. Many Braze customers dedicate entire teams to journey creation and optimization.

Iterable‘s Studio takes a more guided approach. While it offers similar capabilities (multi-channel orchestration, behavioral triggers, A/B testing), the interface prioritizes clarity over granular control. Key differences include:

  • AI-powered Journey Assist that can create workflows from natural language prompts
  • Simpler visual representation that’s easier to understand at a glance
  • Built-in guidance that helps users toward effective journey design
Source: Iterable

The trade-off is real but often acceptable. Iterable’s Studio might not support the exact edge case that Braze’s Canvas Flow can handle, but it delivers comparable functionality with significantly less complexity.

While both platforms provide basic email validation and bounce handling, they primarily react to problems after they occur. This is where mailfloss becomes essential, proactively removing bad emails before they can damage your sender reputation or skew your analytics.

AI features separate modern platforms from legacy solutions

Artificial intelligence has become table stakes for modern marketing platforms, but Braze and Iterable take notably different approaches.

Braze has been building AI capabilities for almost a decade, with recent acceleration through initiatives like Project Catalyst. Their Sage AI suite focuses on:

  • Message Content Recommendations to optimize copy
  • Predictive analytics for churn and conversion likelihood
  • Intelligent Channel selection to pick the best communication method
  • Project Catalyst for automated experience creation and testing
Source: Braze

Many of Braze’s AI features feel powerful but require understanding the underlying mechanics and having clean, well-structured data to use effectively.

Iterable has deeply integrated AI throughout its platform. Their AI suite includes:

The key differentiator is Iterable’s “glass box” approach to AI. Rather than hiding the logic, they show marketers why the AI made specific recommendations. This transparency builds trust and helps teams learn what drives customer behavior.

Source: Iterable

Both platforms assume you’re sending to valid email addresses. mailfloss’s automated verification ensures this assumption holds true, preventing AI models from being trained on data from non-existent users.

Pricing transparency (or lack thereof) tells its own story

Nothing reveals a platform’s target market quite like its pricing strategy.

Braze‘s pricing is famously opaque. Getting a quote requires multiple meetings and complex negotiations. Industry reports suggest annual contracts ranging from $60,000 to well over $200,000, depending on usage and features. This enterprise sales approach makes sense for their target market but frustrates smaller companies trying to evaluate options.

The pricing factors include:

  • Monthly Active Users (MAUs)
  • Data points and custom events
  • Advanced features like predictive analytics
  • Onboarding and support levels

Iterable‘s pricing is more accessible but still not public. Reports indicate starting prices around $500-1,000/month, with median annual contracts around $32,000. They offer three tiers (Growth, Scale, Enterprise) that provide clearer feature delineation than Braze’s custom approach.

mailfloss stands out with completely transparent pricing:

  • Lite: $29/month for 10,000 verifications
  • Business: $59/month for 25,000 verifications
  • Pro: $209/month for 125,000 verifications

This transparency reflects their different market position. While Braze and Iterable sell complex platforms requiring consultation, mailfloss sells a straightforward service with clear value.

Integration ecosystems reflect target markets

A platform’s integration strategy reveals who they’re really built for.

Braze offers deep integrations through their Braze Alloys partner ecosystem, connecting with enterprise favorites like Snowflake, Salesforce, and Adobe. These aren’t just data pipes; they’re sophisticated bi-directional connections that enable complex use cases.

Source: Braze

Their Cloud Data Ingestion (CDI) feature exemplifies this enterprise focus. It allows direct connection to data warehouses for zero-copy data access, a feature that requires significant technical infrastructure to use effectively.

Iterable casts a wider net with numerous integrations spanning the marketing technology landscape. They prioritize accessibility, offering pre-built connectors for popular tools like Shopify, Segment, and Zapier. Their Smart Ingest feature, co-developed with Hightouch, brings enterprise-grade data warehouse connectivity to teams without requiring extensive technical expertise.

The philosophical difference is clear: Braze assumes you have a data team to manage integrations, while Iterable helps marketers connect tools themselves.

mailfloss takes yet another approach, integrating directly with 40+ email service providers. Rather than broad marketplace coverage, they focus on deep, native integrations that enable their core value proposition: automated list cleaning without manual intervention.

The hidden cost of poor email hygiene affects both platforms

Here’s the dirty secret neither Braze nor Iterable prominently advertises: email lists decay at roughly 22.5% per year. People change jobs, abandon email addresses, or simply become inactive.

This decay creates cascading problems:

  • Damaged sender reputation: ISPs track bounce rates religiously. High bounces signal low-quality sending practices, pushing future emails to spam folders.
  • Skewed analytics: When 20% of your list is dead weight, your open rates and engagement metrics become significantly distorted.
  • Wasted money: Both Braze and Iterable charge based on audience size. Why pay for email addresses that don’t exist?
  • Reduced deliverability: Poor list hygiene creates a downward spiral where even engaged subscribers may see reduced inbox placement.

Neither platform offers comprehensive solutions. Braze and Iterable provide basic bounce handling and syntax validation, but these reactive measures come after damage is already done. By the time an email hard bounces, your sender reputation has already taken a hit.

mailfloss helps you avoid email list problems through proactive, automated cleaning that keeps your list healthy and accurate without the need for manual work.

It begins with a 60-second setup, followed by daily and real-time scans that detect invalid, disposable, or undeliverable email addresses before you send any campaigns. This reduces bounce rates and protects your domain reputation by ensuring you’re only contacting real, reachable people.

Next, mailfloss uses automatic typo correction to catch and fix common email mistakes like “gamil.com” or “yaho.com.” This allows you to recover leads who may have entered their email incorrectly and would have otherwise been lost.

With real-time verification, mailfloss checks email addresses as they are submitted through forms or other sources. This blocks invalid or low-quality data from entering your systems and saves you from future cleanup.

Finally, decay protection ensures your list stays clean over time. mailfloss continuously monitors and re-verifies emails in the background so your data remains accurate as addresses change, expire, or become inactive.

For the cost of a few coffees, mailfloss protects the massive investments companies make in Braze or Iterable.

Braze vs Iterable vs mailfloss: Which should you choose?

The choice between these platforms depends on your organization’s size, sophistication, and priorities.

Choose Braze if:

  • You’re an enterprise with dedicated technical resources
  • Scale and reliability trump all other considerations
  • You need the deepest mobile engagement capabilities
  • Budget isn’t a primary constraint
  • You’re willing to invest months in platform mastery

Start your Braze journey by requesting a demo

Choose Iterable if:

  • You want enterprise capabilities without enterprise complexity
  • Your marketing team needs to work independently
  • AI-powered optimization and insights are priorities
  • You prefer clearer feature tiers within a custom pricing model
  • Time-to-value matters more than infinite customization

Explore Iterable’s capabilities with a demo

Use mailfloss with either if:

  • You understand that list quality determines email marketing ROI
  • Automated maintenance appeals more than manual list cleaning
  • You want to protect your sender reputation proactively
  • Accurate analytics matter for your decision-making
  • You believe the foundation should be solid before building higher

Start your 7-day free trial of mailfloss

The most successful companies don’t see these as competing options but as complementary tools. Braze or Iterable provides the engagement engine, while mailfloss ensures that engine runs on clean fuel. In an era where customer attention is the scarcest resource, can you afford to waste it on emails that never arrive?

Your sophisticated campaigns, beautiful templates, and AI-powered personalization mean nothing if they land in spam folders or bounce entirely. Whether you choose Braze’s enterprise power or Iterable’s accessible sophistication, adding mailfloss ensures your investment actually reaches real customers.